So in this one, we will continue the previous post on Clean Garments, and look deeper into the clothes worn by the Priests. And, we will particularly look into the stones on the Breastplate as worn by the Priests as they entered into holy worship. You see, we believe these stones have healing qualities both to human surroundings and a person's electric energy field. Sounds airy fairy for some, but good enough for the Bible, certainly good enough for us. There are great benefits for you as a person, if you can, source some of these stones and place them in your house or at the place of prayer. The Ambiance should change pretty much immediately and will help clear away perhaps dark spots in auras and other unclean things clinging to your environment, or worse to you as a person. Give it a try!
Now this will be a deep dive into African Gemology, so bear with us through all the nomenclature (names) of different stones. We are just trying to find the right ones, as we believe the modern and (obvious) faulty placement of ancient and Biblical Israel, is of course going to affect what stone the ancient sources were indeed talking about. As well, we believe the corresponding stone would be from the area of the Representing Tribe, we think or at the very least in an area not far from each Tribe and their respective lands.
That being said, we can easily deduce that the Ancient Hebrews at the height and grand epitome of Solomons power, would have access to pretty much any Gemstone. And when they left Egypt in the Exodus, it is written that they took the Gemstones with them (Exodus 22,35-36). Furthermore, they obtained them from neighboring countries such as Babylon, Egypt, and even India (Ancient Persia). And from places such as Havilah and Ophir, which were full of all kinds of minerals and gold (I Kings 9,26-22):
"26 King Solomon built a fleet of ships at Ezion-Geber, which is near Eloth on the Shore of the Red Sea, in the land of Edom. 27 Hiram sent his servants with the fleet, sailors who were familiar with the sea, together with the servants of Solomon. 28 They went to Ophir, and imported from there 420 talents of gold, which they delivered to King Solomon."
Adding to references to modern collectibles like gold, we find plenty of references to gemstones and other precious minerals through our Scriptures. We also find wordings like The Treasure of the King of Tyre (Ezekiel 28), and stones mentioned as being the foundation of The New Jerusalem (Book of Tobit & Book of Revelation). Now there were 12 stones on the breastplate and then two stones on the shoulder pieces, considered just as precious as the twelve or even more. Now at the time of the translation of the Greek Scriptures (Septuagint), we find that the ancient Hebrew names no longer apply to fully identify the right stones. So therefore the translators used various Greek words, some times it simplifies, while other times its the cause of great confusion. We will try to clear up, mainly by using stones that are indigenous to the African continent and readily available in Southern Africa. And we know there is no lack of blessings and minerals in this ground. Miners will tell you, the ground is littered with gemstones.
Now, ancient texts do not classify the gemstones as we do today, by analyzing the composition and crystalline form. Names were rather given for color and perhaps where they were located in the ground itself. So we must try to do the same. Now get caught up in the technical name, but rather focus on the color and hints given by other ancient Greek authors. They can't all be wrong, so we will include the most unlikely ones to lie or give a political opinion, rather than just an objective observation. And some Greeks will supply you with just that.
Now there are several mentions in the Bible of the sacred attire worn by the High Priests of Ancient Israel. We see that in the Book of Exodus, the breastplate of judgment/watchtower (hoseni mispa), found in Exodus 28,15:
15 You shall make a breast-piece of judgment (watchtower), in skilled work, you shall make it in the style of the Ephod; of gold, of blue and purple crimson years, and of fine twisted linen you shall make it. 16 It shall be square and doubled, a span in length and a span in width."
Raises more questions than they answer really, at least for us. So without further ado lets get into the meat now, no more milk. Lets dive !
Now when reading about these sacred attires and breastplates as described in Exodus, its hard not to imagine the style looking like the same style as with the woman you can find below, in her beautiful traditional attire. The ancient old Traditional Healers would have an attire not too far removed from the Ephod (Tunic) of sacred stones, like the ones we find in the image below. Now according to the priestly breastplate descriptions in Exodus, it was a demonstration of masterfully skilled work. African artwork, for those who know, can be very skilled but more importantly spiritual at the same time. Further in describing this attire - we find the plate of gold attached to a tunic or a vest-like garment most likely made out of the finest threads of linen, called an Ephod (modern Hebrew not ancient Hebrew). This Vest or long Tunic would have had gold chains/strands tied to gold rings on the shoulder straps, and a blue ribbon (TziTzi) tied to the gold rings at the belt of the Ephod. Defining the four garments of one's robe. And we remember the bleeding woman, she touched the corners of Christ's garment, and she was healed. Now Wikipedia and Google would like you to believe it looked something like the above. We think it would have looked more like the beaded version (in our previous post for those that need images) combined with the one very old Zulu attire coming even further below. Here we will show you a literal literal vest with stones sewn into it. Not medieval-looking like above, but deeply African like these examples. Royalty. Just think African Royalty.
Now this lady on the left has the attire of a traditional healer (yes you can call her a Sangoma). The beadwork and colors are not there by chance and tell a story well beyond the confines of this realm. The attire and stories are of a deeply Spiritual nature. We want you to try to think somewhere along the lines of this as the type of attire for the Priests of Ancient Israel. Use these images and the information we find in our Bible, then and only then are we on the right track. We have a private photo taken at AmmaZulu Palace in Durban (Kloof), and we hope the owners of all these ancient relics will not judge us too harshly for sharing it. Now there is one particular item from that palace, which is almost like a museum for ancient Zulu history. This one item we think represents the Priestly Garments closely (included here it as a main piece). Combine it with the Xhosa dress above, we are close.
So then, starting again with the description of the Ephon High Priest garment, keep looking to your right and use your ancient old archives in your prayers, some of your ancestral lineage may have been wearing these in the Temple. A tunic-like garment, with gold chains tied to gold rings on the shoulder straps, with a blue ribbon tied to the gold rings at the belt of the Ephod. Furthermore, the descriptions in the Bible tell us that the breastplate was made from the same material as the Ephod (material not known, we suspect linen although the material on the piece to the right is raw cowhide, Eland, and or Kudu). The Ephod was to be 1/3 of a cubit, two layers thick with 4 rows of engraved gems embedded in golden plates, where the stones would rest. Further, it says that the squared breastplate was to be formed from one rectangular piece of cloth (linen) 1/3 of a cubit by 2/3 of a cubit, folded in a pouch that held Urim and Thummim (whatever they truly were back in the day). Some say these were just one black and one white stone that were used to cast lots, the truth is we don't rightly know and too much guesswork has been made of these in our opinion. The Hebrew word for the Breastplate was Hoseni / Hosen, means simply foldable. The attire we see in the image from Old Zulu culture is certainly foldable.
On the left we see more examples of African beadwork, the patterns and the colors all tell stories from hundreds even thousands of years back. Past struggles and wars, what to always remember and never forget what your ancestors did. Not many can discern the stories from these vests and what some of them have to tell just from the last century, that knowledge is slowly and sadly dying out. Being forgotten by the youth. Perhaps all they wanted their children to remember, most of all is that We are One, as SoNiNi is One. If we can agree on that. Everything changes in a heartbeat. We have prayed to SoNiNi that there might be someone out there who has a good hand and can draw what will be shown to those who follow Him, in terms of what the Priestly Garments used to look like. Please head the calling, draw it and send it to us. We will publish it here, with or without credits, or whatever the artist wishes. The images could come in the form of a dream or vision. Do not hesitate to write to us.
Sacred Stones
Now moving on to the concept of Jewels and sacred stones. We should have cut this article in two pieces, but hey reading is healthy. If you can't read an article 15 minutes long, how will you ever get through the full length of the Bible? Anyways, reading creates a healthy mind, that makes its own images. So after much ado here we have decided to include a modern image AND interpretation of the gems found on the breastplate. However, we believe some of these modern interpretations are not correct. Hence there are some stones with some other names than what they would be known in ancient times. We will try to give the Africans stones below.
So the Jewels in the breastplate were each made from specific earthly minerals (all different). Each one was described as representing a specific tribe, whose name was also inscribed on the stone itself (with a very hard object). Now this is what we can say with a degree of surety because the Bible tells us this. The rest becomes interpretation and conjectural, as for the listing and order of the names. Jerusalem Targum (later works mind you), say they appeared in the order they were born. Others again have different views. Like 6 sons of Leah arranged one after another on one stone (with Juda first), followed by Rachels sons with concubine sons in between the two sons of Rachel. Or, the simplest explanation is they were arranged after when they were born OR after the land allotment in Genesis. Hard to say, but not really important (yet).
After the arrangement of The 12 Tribes, there were two onyx stones placed on the shoulders of the High Priest. And you see here we mention onyx, because well the stones and rubies on the vest become hard to identify. This is because ancient Hebrew very few people now know how to pronounce it as it was written (probably Proto or Paleo Hebrew). So then, we have to put more of our trust in not the Masoretic (Hebrew) text, but the Septuagint. The Greek Scriptures. And, although they are at times more clear on some subjects, researchers feel as if the Stones and various gems obviously may changed meaning from ancient times up until now. It's not that far-fetched especially when Ancient Israel is even no longer thought to be on the Continent. Therefore we will go through each stone below, and theorise which stone it may have been, and what it may have looked like with its accompanying tribe.
Now this is a comprehensive study in its own right, to get to the gemstone correctly in type and order. And it goes without saying that these are of course a subject of great disagreements among Christians and other denominations. Gemology. Go there you open another door and who knows what or who you will find there. Well-meaning people? Sure, people with knowledge of ancient African jewels. Unlikely. So we take it upon ourselves, with Scripture and SoNiNi as our guide, and at least some wisdom will form from that. Siyabonga uBawo.
Firstly some Scriptures to substantiate these claims, so below follows the gemstones and we are sticking to the Greek for now, although we will have to include ancient Hebrew and Latin to further explain these (Exodus 28,17-20):
"17 You shall set in it four rows of stone.
A row of Carnelian, chrysolite, and emerald shall be the first row; 18 and the second row a turquoise, sapphire, and a moonstone; 19 and the third row a jacinth, an agate, and an amethyst; 20 and the fourth row a beryl, an onyx, and a jasper; they shall be set in gold filigree. 21 There shall be twelve stones with names corresponding to the names of the Sons of Israel; they shall be like signets, each engraved with its name, for twelve Tribes."
Odem in Hebrew - Sardios in Greek
Now both these base text languages give us some form of the color red. And, in our Scriptures, this stone is connected to Adam in the Bible. This raises a few questions, as we will support with more Scriptures - was Adam red? What color is SoNiNi, would they not look the same?
This stone seems to be rather a common stone at least from the writings of the classical cultures (Greeks and other explorers that at least traveled in Africa). Therefore we feel quite confident that this is the actual stone mentioned in our Scriptures. Now this stone, from both the Koine Greek and ancient Hebrew, seems to liken carnelian and jasper, a flesh-like color, said to be blood red. In Antiquity, it was a valued stone said to stop bleeding and a very common artifact among the other African peoples in Egypt, Babylonia, and Assyria (all on the African continent). Now see the descriptions of SoNiNi Himself in Revelation and other places... What stone is He compared to? Go ahead and read Revelation 4,3, you can see SoNiNi is likened to the color of this very stone Carnelian and a combination of Jasper (Jasper is included further down as it seems to denote more than one color).
Now, it is the African opinion in general that SoNiNi is black in complexion, like all of The Twelve Tribes. That may very well be, because Africa does not have to be red people like this except for some South Americans, and Native Americans but there are Northern African people. Imhlope He is certainly not and as for Redskin, it is another fittingly suppressive and derogatory term. Whatever that may be, we don't like these terms much, but they exist. And as much as a black man can call another man black, mind you there are Africans, especially in xenophobic South Africa that say things like northern Africans (the Red People) are not to be considered true Africans. Like it's somehow a competition for purity of complexion by now. Keeping their bloodline pure, as one African lady said. How is that not Black Supremacy? We know white supremacy exists, but do black people really have to go the same way? Thinking we are better than those people, or worse than these other ones. Creating nicknames like maparas or zama-zamas, or are they not our brothers and sisters? Sheesh, people with a divisive and racial mindset have such a long way to go. Christ will smash these beliefs, as we are all One in Him. Aint no tribe or color with Christ.
Anyways, back to The Old One and His Color. Now is it not interesting that as a contemporary source cartoons have been saying for years that the devil is red? We won't extrapolate too much on this here but it sure should be provoking to put their Scriptures together. So We leave this one for the discerning mind to think about. What Color is SoNiNi naNiNi? Look at this most beautiful Banded Carnelian Agate stone below. Makes you think - ain't it...?
Carnelian is the first gemstone out and is said to represent The Tribe of Reuben, and it was said to be plentiful in the ancient City of Sardes where ancient sources say it was first found. This stone is very beautiful to look at and has anything from veins to clouds growing inside of it, with delicate veins of light red or white, that look like agate structures at times. However, the finest Carnelian stones are found in the East Indies, some distance from the Continent. So even this stone, is not set in stone. Remember this stone will give you SoNiNis color and quite possibly the very make of Adam. Now before you go too deep into this, people remember the Commandment, not to make an image out of Him, even if you may know His color, don't imagine Him. He is so much more than a human mind can take. Remember none shall see me and live. Even Moses only saw his backside. But the descriptions of those that have glazed in the direction of the Most High, all mention this stone. Alright, let's get back to stones. The next one is truly an African stone.
Pithda in Hebrew - Topazios in Greek
Now already on the second stone things start to get complicated and rather contradictory. Even though the stone below might certainly belong to another tribe or may not even be one of the 12 Stones included on the breastplate. We will include it just to show what diverse beauties lie deep and shallow in the African soil. Such geological wonders they are. Now Topaz is a relatively new word and seems to be either of two ancient stones as discussed by various commentaries. And we will let the region and other ancient descriptions help determine what rock this may have been.
Most theories go for the yellow color topaz as a mineral stone from Topazos Island, we think this is not it. Others suggest a pure yellow or green stone. All these become even less likely when reading Job 28,19 which talks about the Topaz of Ethiopia, which according to Pliny was tinted Green (Natural Histories 37,8). So the Pithda would be neither topaz nor chrysolite. Now think about this, what Ethiopia is Job talking about, certainly not modern Ethiopia and Cush. Then we have to ask where was ancient Ethiopia, some say Cush would be in the very same area as Arabia. And we know that Arabia would have been the areas of Namibia, parts of Angola, and perhaps Botswana. So we are going to offer a very different theory of this particular stone. It could be this one in the photos found in Namibia, not easy to come by and ranges in color from also being brownish red, to Blue and Grey and Yellow.
We think it could be closer to a Namibian Pietersite Cabochon, for your average rock lover. And yes, it would validate Job's comment on these, as they are exceptionally rare, found in Namibia and China (Only). And are in their finest form as rare as gold, perhaps even more. Now this stone was said to represent The Tribe of Simeon, or Somoni. And we can find more comments of this stone being rarer than Gold if we study the ancient Hebrew. Plays on words on treasure and native gold, often found in river washings and nuggets, which was the purest form. Another wording (כֶּחֶם) is more of a poetical form of a name, used for Gold with extreme purity (Song of Solomon 5,11). But Job uses all these forms on the play of word (סָגוּר), whose root is yellow (זהב), to say none of these gemstones are worth more than wisdom. Either way or whatever this stone did look like, it was a rare one and more precious than gold.
Bareket in Hebrew - Smaragdos in Greek
Now the third stone is something that means Lightning flash, shimmery or just plain old shiny, in Hebrew. Therefore it seems scholars are happy to call this one a Green Emerald, as it fits their descriptions. But far from it, this one seems to be a tricky one and the Greek does not help as this Smaragdos is applied for a number of different Gemstones, not just the Green Emerald which in fairness would fit better with descriptions as Stone number Two (Namibian Pieterisite).
That being said, what is good about the Green Emerald is that it is found in Africa and specifically in Egypt, supposedly loved by Cleopatra among other Egyptian rulers. So if it was loved as it was by such a famous ancient ruler, it must have been quite flashy and definitely a head-turner. If we go to the Hebrew text, it does not help us either, as no color is denoted in the Masoretic text. In Ezekiel 28,13 we find Bareket rendered as Onyx which raises more questions than answers. Onyx and Onychion mean fingernails, more specifically human fingernails. Very far from Green then. However, from the image above we can see that there appear to be some lightning strikes in this polished and carat-rich example of a Green Emerald. You could see an African ruler like Cleopatra wanting to desire this piece around her neck.
If we go to some ancient sources, we can find some in Origens Hexapla, who writes (κεραύνιος), literally means thunderbolt. Bareket is related to barak (lightning) as we find it in Exodus 28,17. If we go to Jerome, translator of the Latin Scriptures (Roman language), he said it meant Onyx. Not much help here, as Green Emerald certainly looks very different from Onyx. Therefore we included images of them both. And as you can see the Onyx is a very different stone altogether, comes in all colors really. Black is the most dramatic as it does have these inclusions and intrusions that seem to follow this stone. We will also offer another theory here that this stone may actually have been a Fluorite, available in South Africa, and as beautiful as they come.
So whatever this gemstone actually looked like, this is the stone said to represent the Tribes of the Priests The Tribe of Levi, and the fourth foundational stone said to be in the celestial Jerusalem. Again the sequence of these is not 100%, same with the stones. Whichever theory you go for, this stone is mentioned in many places in our Scriptures and in different texts and Bible translations. The Hebrew root word is lightning or glitter. Now the debate goes on if this really was a Green Emerald, multi-colored onyx (diamond-like stone) or just a Fluorite. Pliny seems to think it was Green Emerald the same with Theophrastus. The Green Emerald was said to also have healing abilities, among them preserving and aid problems with eyes. With all this being said on stone number 3, we are not certain of this one at all.
Nofekh in Hebrew - Anthrax in Greek
Moving on to what they call the second Row of stones (3 stones in each row), and this is the 4th stone. This Gem is something that when translated from ancient Hebrew simply means coal or the color of burning coal. The Latin reads Carbunculus, which is a different stone again (Carbuncle is red). It's important to decide whether it is referring to coal in the process of burning or after it has been burnt. After burning it would simply be black. While burning, it would look like hot coal. Now there seems to be agreement among many of the ancient Historians, like Philo of Alexandria, who said it was Red. Josephus also said it was red. Now the Egyptian word mfket, meant malachite or the color turquoise, both look kinda green and blue. That's far from the color of burning coal.
Now if Christ was of the Tribe of Juda, this Stone was said to represent the Tribe of Juda. Meaning it would be a specially eye-catching gemstone. The Red Ruby was the eight stone mentioned in the riches of The King of Tyre and was said to not necessarily be native. We think that is not entirely true and all stone would be found in the Southern areas of Africa. Now Theophrastus said it was anthrax and Pliny said Carbuncle, Petronius said Chardchedonius.... Arabs called it ardjouani, which would translate mostly as red glittery stone. The oriental Ruby seems likely, but it exists in Africa as well. Theophrastus description seems to give the most away: "Its color is red and of such a kind that when it is held against the sun it resembles a burning coal."
The gemstone we see images of here is a red garnet from Mozambique. And we believe we are close on this one, they are as rare as they come but available in Southern Africa. So this rock or gem may have been a Garnet or what is also called a Ruby (more like a crystal) looking stone. Nevertheless, some ancient authors (Babylonian Targum) still feel this stone was actually green in color. So we not out of the woods yet. Still many ancient authors seem to be in unison, that it was red, and this stone fits location-wise. However Calling it Carbuncle, although we can get that name from our Bibles, we feel it is not specific enough. Carbuncles are named differently according to place of origin. Like Pliny would cite the Indian Carbuncle, very much different from the African Carbuncle.
Sapir in Hebrew - Sapphiros in Greek
Then we come to stone number 5 - called Sapir in Hebrew and Sapphiros in Greek. Now historically the Sapphire we know today was rather unknown back in Roman times and the Greek text appears to be more a literal copy and transliteration of the ancient Hebrew.
Therefore we are not going to bring in the theory of the traditional Blue Sapphire. Instead, we are going for the mineral stone known as Sodalite, plentiful in Southern Africa especially in Namibia. Now others will pinpoint this stone as being what is known as Lapis Lazuli, we admit it is a good candidate as they look very much alike. However we are looking for something readily available in Southern Africa, and then this stone is the much better candidate. You can travel to the Northern Cape and you will find this stone without even looking that hard for it. This stone, Sapir - was said to have been gifted to Akhenaten from Babylon, according to ancient sources. Now again we are going to use Theophrastus quotes as he said it was dark in color and had the color of verdigris and speckled with gold. So we might be of on this one, still.
This stone if called a Sodalite, was said to Represent the Tribe of Isaka (Issachar), and was called the second foundational stone in Jerusalem. This stone often was described as having intrusions in it, explaining Theophrastus's quotes of the Gold hidden in the rock (shining pyrites). Now some of you may not know Theophrastus, but he seems to be reliable when it comes to ancient sources. The successor to Aristotle and a native of Eresos in Lesbos on the African continent. Now, the Sodalite we think he described has been found as massive crystals, found as a Euhedral in northern Namibia and in Italy.
Yahalom in Hebrew - Beryllios in Greek
Now this stone is also called Iaspis (in the Septuagint) and Beryllios in other Greek sources and that causes a little confusion. However, the Hebrew text says Yahalom, which means strike hard. That's a major hint. This is stone number 6 and we are at the end of the second row of stones. The Hebrew root (hallamish) means flint, referring to a precious and very hard stone, that was possibly white in color or an insignificant color. Like pink? Could this be a diamond?
Running with the idea of this being a Pink Diamond, the Greeks might have been calling diamonds for Onyx (Onychion) back in the day. Onyx was derived from the Greek fingernail, on account of the pink-white veining and color of the human fingernail. The repeated reference to hardness and the often translation of Onyx, seems to denote that this stone could have been a Diamond. This stone was said to be the 8th stone of the foundation of the New Jerusalem. Now going into the etymology here, we are not going to get much wiser. There are differences everywhere, and we end up calling this a Jasper (Isaspis), as Greek Jasper and Latin Jasper certainly are not the same. The same with Greek and Latin Beryllus.
Now we will get nowhere in arguing what composition this stone may have had. If we rather go to the oldest etymology we have, we see that Yahalom may indeed have denoted another type of stone. We can find these stones, more honeycomb, and certainly striking and extreme brilliance. So could all the modern translators be wrong? Well, of course. From Hebrew to Greek, things can easily get lost. And the main translation of this stone seems to be Onyx, which is a form of diamond. But we include the Tanzanian Imperial Circon to show what kinds of beauties do lie in the African soil. Just look at this and wonder if this was not the shoulder pieces to represent Levi? Could just be. We are taking a chance and saying this stone was related to the Tribe of Manasseh, but that is certainly up for interpretation.
Lesem in Hebrew - Ligurios in Greek
So we have come to the third row and stone number 7. This was called Lesem in Hebrew and Ligurios in Greek (this seems to refer to places called Leshem and Liguria). Now Theophrastus mentions Amber as being fossilised pine resin, called Liggourrion (lyngurium). Amber is also talked about and referred to by Dioscorides and Aëtius. In Greek Antiquity, this stone was believed to be the solidified urine of the lynx (a type of cat, perhaps like Caracal). Bearing this color in mind, its not to hard to imagine, and the name might be derived from Lykos ouron, meaning white urine.
Now if we consult Pliny, he seems to say many interesting things, like the stone had electrical properties, which seems to confirm that it might be Amber indeed. This stone seems steeped in Greek mythology and has even found its way into the language and etymology of the word elektron (ἤλεκτρον) and the beaming sun. Here we find Helios and Phaeton (Son of the Sun) who gives rise to electricity in the end. Pliny the Elder again gave the name Glaesum that the Romans were said to have latched on to.
Another nugget is given by Pliny.... that Amber is:
....is a liquid produced by the rays of the sun; and that these rays, at the moment of the sun's setting, striking with the greatest force upon the surface of the soil, leave upon it an unctuous sweat, which is carried off by the tides of the Ocean.
Another quote on how amber was formed, which sounds completely different, is quoted by Pliny in Natural History (Book 37, Section XI):
Amber is produced from a marrow discharged by trees belonging to the pine genus, like gum from the cherry, and resin from the ordinary pine. It is a liquid at first, which issues forth in considerable quantities, and is gradually hardened [...] Our forefathers, too, were of opinion that it is the juice of a tree, and for this reason gave it the name of "succinum" and one great proof that it is the produce of a tree of the pine genus, is the fact that it emits a pine-like smell when rubbed, and that it burns, when ignited, with the odour and appearance of torch-pine wood."
Comments